When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Argument from morality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_morality

    t. e. The argument from morality is an argument for the existence of God. Arguments from morality tend to be based on moral normativity or moral order. Arguments from moral normativity observe some aspect of morality and argue that God is the best or only explanation for this, concluding that God must exist. Arguments from moral order are based ...

  3. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics:_Inventing_Right...

    The argument from disagreement, also known as the argument from relativity, first observes that there is a lot of intractable moral disagreement: people disagree about what is right and what is wrong. [3] Mackie argues that the best explanation of this is that right and wrong are invented, not objective truths.

  4. Kantian ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kantian_ethics

    Kantian ethics refers to a deontological ethical theory developed by German philosopher Immanuel Kant that is based on the notion that "I ought never to act except in such a way that I could also will that my maxim should become a universal law." It is also associated with the idea that "it is impossible to think of anything at all in the world ...

  5. Moral relativism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_relativism

    Moral relativism or ethical relativism (often reformulated as relativist ethics or relativist morality) is used to describe several philosophical positions concerned with the differences in moral judgments across different peoples and cultures. An advocate of such ideas is often referred to as a relativist. Descriptive moral relativism holds ...

  6. Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg's_stages...

    Arguing that his theory measures moral reasoning and not particular moral conclusions, Kohlberg insists that the form and structure of moral arguments is independent of the content of those arguments, a position he calls "formalism". [2] [9] Kohlberg's theory follows the notion that justice is the essential characteristic of moral reasoning.

  7. Ethical dilemma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_dilemma

    Ethical dilemma. In philosophy, an ethical dilemma, also called an ethical paradox or moral dilemma, is a situation in which two or more conflicting moral imperatives, none of which overrides the other, confront an agent. A closely related definition characterizes an ethical dilemma as a situation in which every available choice is wrong.

  8. Normative ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normative_ethics

    Normative ethics is the study of ethical behaviour and is the branch of philosophical ethics that investigates questions regarding how one ought to act, in a moral sense. Normative ethics is distinct from meta-ethics in that the former examines standards for the rightness and wrongness of actions, whereas the latter studies the meaning of moral ...

  9. Consequentialism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequentialism

    Philosophy. In moral philosophy, consequentialism is a class of normative, teleological ethical theories that holds that the consequences of one's conduct are the ultimate basis for judgement about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct. Thus, from a consequentialist standpoint, a morally right act (including omission from acting) is one ...