Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Use this cleanup template to indicate that an article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Template parameters [Edit template data] This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status Month and year date The month and ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Userspace essays should remain categorized in Category:User essays or one of its subcategories with this template. Essays are sorted by their page name, or in userspace by subpage name. If you want to use a different category sort, you can specify an entire category link with a sort key: |cat=[[Category:User essays on style|Comprise, Use of]]
This template is used in articles to identify sentences or short passages with information or analysis that has one or more inline citations but which are to insufficiently reliable sources. It produces the super-scripted text "better source needed". Template parameters This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status Reason reason A reason as to why, or ...
Template: Better source needed example/doc. Add languages. Add links ...
An article suffering from such language should be rewritten to correct the problem or, if an editor is unsure how best to make a correction, the article may be tagged with an appropriate template, such as {{Peacock term}}. Puffery is an example of positively loaded language; negatively loaded language should be avoided just as much. People ...
You can also include a |reason= note, which displays as a tooltip upon mouse hover, to leave a better record for future editors. For example, the following usage might be appropriate when the source discusses the example is an example in one context, while the article discusses the example in a different context: