Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Soviet Union The 1971 Aral smallpox incident was the outbreak of viral disease which occurred as a result of a field test at a Soviet biological weapons facility on an island in the Aral Sea. The incident sickened ten people, of whom three died, and came to widespread public notice only in 2002. [9] 1972-03 [10] Smallpox United Kingdom
Scientific misconduct is the violation of the standard codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in the publication of professional scientific research.A Lancet review on Handling of Scientific Misconduct in Scandinavian countries gave examples of policy definitions.
British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v British Columbia Government Service Employees' Union [1999] 3 SCR 3, 1999 SCC 48 – called Meiorin for short – is a Supreme Court of Canada case that created a unified test to determine if a violation of human rights legislation can be justified as a bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR).
Borowski v Canada (AG) [1989] 1 SCR 342 March 9, 1989 Abortion R v Potvin [1989] 1 SCR 525 Black v Law Society of Alberta [1989] 1 SCR 591 April 20, 1989 Mobility rights and freedom of association; Charter General Motors of Canada Ltd v City National Leasing [1989] 1 SCR 641 April 20, 1989 Federalism Irwin Toy Ltd v Quebec (AG) [1989] 1 SCR 927
A biological hazard, or biohazard, is a biological substance that poses a threat (or is a hazard) to the health of living organisms, primarily humans. This could include a sample of a microorganism, virus or toxin that can adversely affect human health. A biohazard could also be a substance harmful to other living beings. [a]
Unethical human experimentation is human experimentation that violates the principles of medical ethics.Such practices have included denying patients the right to informed consent, using pseudoscientific frameworks such as race science, and torturing people under the guise of research.
Beetz, Estey, and Le Dain JJ. took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. British Columbia Government Employees' Union v British Columbia (AG) , [1988] 2 S.C.R. 214 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the right to picket as a freedom of expression under section 2(b) of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms .
[9] [10] [12] Others depicted the case as a contest between a large biotechnology company and an equally large and well funded anti-biotechnology industry [13] and raised concerns that the facts and context of the case was being misrepresented by Schmeiser, environmental groups and anti-genetic engineering activists. [13] [14] [15] Monsanto v.