When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: least upper bound proof examples problems geometry

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Least-upper-bound property - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least-upper-bound_property

    A real number x is the least upper bound (or supremum) for S if x is an upper bound for S and x ≤ y for every upper bound y of S. The least-upper-bound property states that any non-empty set of real numbers that has an upper bound must have a least upper bound in real numbers .

  3. Infimum and supremum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infimum_and_supremum

    Then has an upper bound (, for example, or ) but no least upper bound in : If we suppose is the least upper bound, a contradiction is immediately deduced because between any two reals and (including and ) there exists some rational , which itself would have to be the least upper bound (if >) or a member of greater than (if <).

  4. Join and meet - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Join_and_meet

    If (,) is a partially ordered set, such that each pair of elements in has a meet, then indeed = if and only if , since in the latter case indeed is a lower bound of , and since is the greatest lower bound if and only if it is a lower bound. Thus, the partial order defined by the meet in the universal algebra approach coincides with the original ...

  5. Triangle inequality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_inequality

    The top example shows a case where z is much less than the sum x + y of the other two sides, and the bottom example shows a case where the side z is only slightly less than x + y. In mathematics , the triangle inequality states that for any triangle , the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than or equal to the length of the ...

  6. Completeness of the real numbers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Completeness_of_the_real...

    The least-upper-bound property states that every nonempty subset of real numbers having an upper bound (or bounded above) must have a least upper bound (or supremum) in the set of real numbers. The rational number line Q does not have the least upper bound property. An example is the subset of rational numbers

  7. Upper and lower bounds - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_and_lower_bounds

    13934 and other numbers x such that x ≥ 13934 would be an upper bound for S. The set S = {42} has 42 as both an upper bound and a lower bound; all other numbers are either an upper bound or a lower bound for that S. Every subset of the natural numbers has a lower bound since the natural numbers have a least element (0 or 1, depending on ...