When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lange v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lange_v._California

    Lange v. California, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the exigent circumstances requirement related to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled unanimously that the warrantless entry into a home by police in pursuit of a misdemeanant is not unequivocally justified.

  3. California law mandates access to police discipline records ...

    www.aol.com/california-law-mandates-access...

    For George Floyd protest records, Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office has been slightly more transparent than the city’s police department. California law mandates access to police discipline ...

  4. California governor proposes rolling back access to police ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-governor-proposes...

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom's administration has proposed an end to public disclosure of investigations of abusive and corrupt police officers, handing the responsibility instead to local ...

  5. People v. Diaz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Diaz

    People v. Diaz, 51 Cal. 4th 84, 244 P.3d 501, 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 105 (Cal. January 3, 2011) was a Supreme Court of California case, which held that police are not required to obtain a warrant to search information contained within a cell phone in a lawful arrest. [1]

  6. It's official: Mark Fuhrman can't be a police officer in ...

    www.aol.com/news/official-mark-fuhrman-cant...

    A state panel newly empowered to cancel or suspend the certifications of police officers and sheriff's deputies determined that Fuhrman was ineligible for certification because of his criminal record.

  7. Samson v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_v._California

    Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court affirmed the California Court of Appeal's ruling that suspicionless searches of parolees are lawful under California law and that the search in this case was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it was not arbitrary, capricious, or harassing.

  8. Miller v. Bonta - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v._Bonta

    The case was argued before Senior Judge Roger Benitez of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The plaintiffs argued that the definition of "assault weapon" is politically motivated and prevents law-abiding citizens from obtaining and using firearms for self-defense, hunting, and other legal purposes. [8]

  9. California Attorney General warned police about license plate ...

    www.aol.com/california-attorney-general-warned...

    The police department in Oakley, a city about 40 miles south of Sacramento, which The N&O found was sharing license plate data with at least seven out-of-state agencies — including in Texas and ...