Ads
related to: decisions and consequences worksheets pdf 1st graders print out onlinegenerationgenius.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
March and Olsen distinguish the logic of appropriateness from what they term the "logic of consequences," more commonly known as rational choice theory.The logic of consequences is based on the assumption that actors have fixed preferences, will make cost-benefit calculations, and choose among different options by evaluating the likely consequences for their objectives.
Consider the Consequences! [a] (published 1930) is a romantic novel in the form of an interactive novel or gamebook [b] by the American writing partnership [c] of Doris Webster [Wikidata] (1885–1967 [3]) and Mary Alden Hopkins (1876–1960 [4]). [1] It is the earliest known gamebook, and has 43 different endings. [1] [5]
Thus, the balance sheet is both an informal measure of readiness for change and an aid for decision-making. [ 12 ] One research paper reported that combining the decisional balance sheet technique with the implementation intentions technique was "more effective in increasing exercise behaviour than a control or either strategy alone."
Intertemporal choice is defined as "decisions with consequences that play out over time". [100] This is often assessed using the relative value people assign to rewards at different points in time, either by asking experimental subjects to choose between alternatives or examining behavioral choices in a naturalistic setting.
Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963), was a Supreme Court of the United States case dealing with equal representation in regard to the American election system and formulated the famous "one person, one vote" standard applied in this case for "counting votes in a Democratic primary election for the nomination of a United States Senator and statewide officers — which was practically ...
G. E. M. Anscombe objects to the consequentialism of Sidgwick on the grounds that the moral worth of an action is premised on the predictive capabilities of the individual, relieving them of the responsibility for the "badness" of an act should they "make out a case for not having foreseen" negative consequences.