When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Copyright infringement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_infringement

    The court said that in the case of copyright infringement, the province guaranteed to the copyright holder by copyright law – certain exclusive rights – is invaded, but no control, physical or otherwise, is taken over the copyright, nor is the copyright holder wholly deprived of using the copyrighted work or exercising the exclusive rights ...

  3. Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_10,_Inc._v._Amazon...

    With respect to vicarious infringement, the court held that Google derived direct financial benefit from infringement of Perfect 10's copyright (in the form of AdWords and AdSense profits), but that it had no power to stop the infringements even if it knew of them. Therefore, the court found Perfect 10 unlikely to succeed in a vicarious ...

  4. Copyright law of the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_law_of_the...

    A copyright owner may bring a copyright infringement lawsuit in federal court. Federal courts have exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction over copyright infringement cases. [75] That is, an infringement case may not be brought in state courts. (With an exception for works not protected under Federal law, but are protected under state law, e.g ...

  5. A statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf; and; An electronic or physical signature (which may be a scanned copy) of the copyright owner. A complaint can be submitted by: Sending a letter to our registered copyright agent.

  6. Steinberg v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steinberg_v._Columbia...

    The court states the test for copyright infringement as copying an item that is the subject of a valid copyright, making no mention of improper appropriation of protectable elements, or in fact any distinction between protectable and unprotectable elements of Steinberg's drawing. This is in contrast to the 2nd Circuit's prior opinion in Nichols v.

  7. Photography and the law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photography_and_the_law

    United States case, concerning the United States Postal Service's use of an image of the Korean War Veterans Memorial for their 2003 commemorative stamps, the photographer of the said image – former Marine John Alli – was included in the copyright infringement lawsuit filed by the monument creator Frank Gaylord against the postal service ...

  8. US Supreme Court rejects ex-lawmaker Steve King's ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-rejects-ex...

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Tuesday to hear Republican former Iowa congressman Steve King's bid to avoid paying a small judgment for having used without permission an internet meme - the ...

  9. Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_v...

    However, according to established case law, the courts have said that copyright can only subsist in subject matter that is original in the sense that it is the author's own 'intellectual creation'. Given this criterion, it seems unlikely that what is merely a retouched, digitised image of an older work can be considered as 'original'.