When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii_Housing_Authority_v...

    Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff , 467 U.S. 229 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a state could use eminent domain to take land that was overwhelmingly concentrated in the hands of private landowners and redistribute it to the wider population of private residents.

  3. Inverse condemnation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_condemnation

    Property law. Inverse condemnation is a legal concept and cause of action used by property owners when a governmental entity takes an action which damages or decreases the value of private property without obtaining ownership of the property through the use of eminent domain. Thus, unlike the typical eminent domain case, the property owner is ...

  4. Eminent domain in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain_in_the...

    Eminent domain in the United States. In the United States, eminent domain is the power of a state or the federal government to take private property for public use while requiring just compensation to be given to the original owner. It can be legislatively delegated by the state to municipalities, government subdivisions, or even to private ...

  5. HART board approves eminent domain filing for Kalihi property

    www.aol.com/hart-board-approves-eminent-domain...

    The full property's total assessed value is approximately $2.9 million, according to the city's Real Property Assessment Division. Service Printers declined to comment on HART's eminent domain action.

  6. Regulatory takings in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_takings_in_the...

    Inverse condemnation is a term which describes a claim brought against the government in which a property owner seeks compensation for a `taking' of his property under the Fifth Amendment. In states that prohibit uncompensated taking or damaging, physical damage to property is included in this definition.

  7. Kelo v. City of New London - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

    Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that the use of eminent domain to transfer land from one private owner to another private owner to further economic development does not violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

  8. City Council urges state action on rising Hawaii property ...

    www.aol.com/news/city-council-urges-state-action...

    A Honolulu City Council resolution wants state lawmakers to address what it deems are “drastic ” increases in property insurance premiums paid by homeowners across Oahu, particularly for those ...

  9. Now, Reynolds, along with the real estate agent, the construction firm, the architect, the prior property owner’s family and the county — which approved the permits — are reportedly being ...