When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Insanity defense - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_defense

    The insanity defense, also known as the mental disorder defense, is an affirmative defense by excuse in a criminal case, ... has only a 26% success rate. [3]

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The due process clause of the United States Constitution does not require states to adopt a definition of the insanity defense that turns on whether the defendant knew that his or her actions were morally wrong. 14th, 8th

  4. United States federal laws governing defendants with mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_laws...

    Per Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2, a defendant intending to pursue an insanity defense must timely notify an attorney for the government in writing. The government then has a right to have the court order a psychiatric or psychological examination.

  5. U.S. Supreme Court lets states bar insanity defense - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/2020-03-23-us-supreme-court...

    The justices ruled 6-3 that a 1995 Kansas law eliminating the insanity defense did not violate the U.S. Constitution.

  6. Jury rejects insanity defense for man convicted of hate crime ...

    www.aol.com/jury-rejects-insanity-defense-man...

    It also cannot be used as a defense for a "temporary frenzy or passion fueled by hate." Contact Kelli Arseneau at 920-213-3721 or karseneau@gannett.com . Follow her on X, formerly Twitter, at ...

  7. Insanity defense withdrawn, man pleads guilty to killing his ...

    www.aol.com/insanity-defense-withdrawn-man...

    On Feb 20, defense lawyer Trey Keith, withdrew the motion to file an insanity defense. Instead, Thomas accepted a deal Friday morning from the Taylor County District Attorney's Office.

  8. Kahler v. Kansas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahler_v._Kansas

    Kahler v. Kansas, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), is a case of the United States Supreme Court in which the justices ruled that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution do not require that states adopt the insanity defense in criminal cases that are based on the defendant's ability to recognize right from wrong.

  9. M'Naghten rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M'Naghten_rules

    The House of Lords delivered the following exposition of the rules: . the jurors ought to be told in all cases that every man is to be presumed to be sane, and to possess a sufficient degree of reason to be responsible for his crimes, until the contrary be proved to their satisfaction; and that to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the ...