Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The idea is to take repeated steps in the opposite direction of the gradient (or approximate gradient) of the function at the current point, because this is the direction of steepest descent. Conversely, stepping in the direction of the gradient will lead to a trajectory that maximizes that function; the procedure is then known as gradient ascent .
The geometric interpretation of Newton's method is that at each iteration, it amounts to the fitting of a parabola to the graph of () at the trial value , having the same slope and curvature as the graph at that point, and then proceeding to the maximum or minimum of that parabola (in higher dimensions, this may also be a saddle point), see below.
In many applications, objective functions, including loss functions as a particular case, are determined by the problem formulation. In other situations, the decision maker’s preference must be elicited and represented by a scalar-valued function (called also utility function) in a form suitable for optimization — the problem that Ragnar Frisch has highlighted in his Nobel Prize lecture. [4]
The Barzilai-Borwein method [1] is an iterative gradient descent method for unconstrained optimization using either of two step sizes derived from the linear trend of the most recent two iterates. This method, and modifications, are globally convergent under mild conditions, [ 2 ] [ 3 ] and perform competitively with conjugate gradient methods ...
Backpropagation computes the gradient of a loss function with respect to the weights of the network for a single input–output example, and does so efficiently, computing the gradient one layer at a time, iterating backward from the last layer to avoid redundant calculations of intermediate terms in the chain rule; this can be derived through ...
Numerous methods exist to compute descent directions, all with differing merits, such as gradient descent or the conjugate gradient method. More generally, if P {\displaystyle P} is a positive definite matrix, then p k = − P ∇ f ( x k ) {\displaystyle p_{k}=-P\nabla f(x_{k})} is a descent direction at x k {\displaystyle x_{k}} . [ 1 ]
where is an approximation to the Hessian matrix at , which is updated iteratively at each stage, and () is the gradient of the function evaluated at x k. A line search in the direction p k is then used to find the next point x k +1 by minimizing f ( x k + γ p k ) {\displaystyle f(\mathbf {x} _{k}+\gamma \mathbf {p} _{k})} over the scalar γ ...
The LMA interpolates between the Gauss–Newton algorithm (GNA) and the method of gradient descent. The LMA is more robust than the GNA, which means that in many cases it finds a solution even if it starts very far off the final minimum. For well-behaved functions and reasonable starting parameters, the LMA tends to be slower than the GNA.