When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. AT&T to pay $13 million to settle FCC probe over cloud data ...

    www.aol.com/t-pay-13-million-settle-203416798.html

    FCC Enforcement Bureau Chief Loyaan A. Egal also said telecom firms "have an obligation to reduce the attack surface and entry points that threat actors seek to exploit in order to access ...

  3. The FCC announced a proposed fine of $146,976 against ESPN for six apparent violations of the Emergency Alert System rules. According to the agency, ESPN transmitted (or caused the transmission of

  4. Outgoing FCC Chair Dismisses Complaints Against TV ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/entertainment/outgoing-fcc-chair...

    In a letter to the Center for American Rights, the FCC Enforcement Bureau denied the complaint, noting that the First Amendment restricts the agency from penalizing the station for the generalized ...

  5. Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2014) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_Communications_Inc...

    Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 740 F.3d 623 (D.C. Cir., 2014), was a case at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacating portions of the FCC Open Internet Order of 2010, which the court determined could only be applied to common carriers and not to Internet service providers. [1]

  6. Consumers' Research v. Federal Communications Commission

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumers'_Research_v...

    The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) administers a universal service program, as authorized by Congress in the Telecommunications Act of 1996.All telephone service customers in the United States pay a monthly fee, and the resulting Universal Service Fund is used by the FCC to subsidize discounts for financially disadvantaged subscribers, build network infrastructure in underserved areas ...

  7. Comcast Corp. v. FCC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comcast_Corp._v._FCC

    Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642 (D.C. Cir., 2010), is a case at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia holding that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not have ancillary jurisdiction over the content delivery choices of Internet service providers, under the language of the Communications Act of 1934. [1]

  8. FCC chair says it’s ‘really concerning’ that a Soros-backed ...

    www.aol.com/fcc-chair-says-really-concerning...

    The Enforcement Bureau proceeding is inquiring whether the radio station — which is licensed to operate by the FCC — is violating the terms of its FCC license, which requires that it operate ...

  9. Mozilla Corp. v. FCC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corp._v._FCC

    The case centered on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)'s decision in 2017 to rollback its prior 2015 Open Internet Order, reclassifying Internet services as an information service rather than as a common carrier, deregulating principles of net neutrality that had been put in place with the 2015 order. The proposed rollback had been ...