When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Brendlin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendlin_v._California

    In the early morning hours of November 27, 2001, a Sutter County deputy sheriff and his partner, who was a cadet at the time, stopped a car in which Bruce Brendlin was riding. The car's registration had expired, but the owner had applied for a renewal, and a valid temporary registration permit was properly affixed to the car. Nevertheless, the ...

  3. South Dakota v. Opperman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Opperman

    Opperman was sentenced to 14 days in jail and fined $100. He appealed, and the Supreme Court of South Dakota reversed his conviction on the grounds that the inventory search was an unreasonable one under the Fourth Amendment. At South Dakota's request, the Supreme Court agreed to review the case.

  4. Regulation of self-driving cars - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Regulation_of_self-driving_cars

    Self-driving car liability is a developing area of law and policy that will determine who is liable when an automated car causes physical damage to persons, or breaks road rules. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] When automated cars shift the control of driving from humans to automated car technology the driver will need to consent to share operational ...

  5. File:The Motor Cars (Driving Instruction) (Amendment ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Motor_Cars...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Pages for logged out editors learn more

  6. United States v. Ross - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Ross

    United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982), was a search and seizure case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States.The high court was asked to decide if a legal warrantless search of an automobile allows closed containers found in the vehicle (specifically, in the trunk) to be searched as well.

  7. Coolidge v. New Hampshire - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolidge_v._New_Hampshire

    Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the Fourth Amendment and the automobile exception.. The state sought to justify the search of a car owned by Edward Coolidge, suspected of killing 14-year-old Pamela Mason in January 1964, on three theories: automobile exception, search incident to arrest and plain view.

  8. Stimulus checks amendment co-introduced by GOP Sen ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/stimulus-checks-amendment-co...

    Republicans, Democrats, and the White House are still unable to resolve the key sticking points in the stimulus negotiations, and the disarray has created a somewhat unlikely alliance.

  9. Motor vehicle exception - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle_exception

    San Francisco Police searching a vehicle after a stop in 2008.. The motor vehicle exception is a legal rule in the United States that modifies the normal probable cause requirement of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and, when applicable, allows a police officer to search a motor vehicle without a search warrant.