Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
This was not the first time AMD has accused Intel Corp. of abusing their power as the leading manufacturer for x86 processors. In 1991, AMD filed an antitrust lawsuit against Intel claiming that they were trying to secure and maintain a monopoly. [7] One year later, a court ruled against Intel, awarding AMD $10 million "plus a royalty-free ...
In Cyrix's first product, the 8087 math co-processor, Cyrix used hardware math multipliers rather than the CORDIC algorithm, which allowed the chip to be faster and more accurate than Intel's co-processor. Thus, while AMD's 386s and even 486s had some Intel-written microcode software, Cyrix's designs were completely independent.
AMD/Hygon joint venture, making CPUs based on AMD Zen1 with some modifications for the Chinese market. [28] MCST: Elbrus 2000: Russian VLIW processor family, designed to run x86 code using dynamic binary translation. Space Electronics Inc. / Maxwell: 80386DXRP: Intel 386 CPUs repackaged in special radiation-hardened packages for use in space ...
AMD lands another notable win against rival Intel. ... 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us. Login / Join. Mail.
The Am386 CPU is a 100%-compatible clone of the Intel 80386 design released by AMD in March 1991. It sold millions of units, positioning AMD as a legitimate competitor to Intel, rather than being merely a second source for x86 CPUs (then termed 8086-family). [1]
AMD processor with Intel copyright. AMD has a long history of litigation with former (and current) partner and x86 creator Intel. [303] [304] [305] In 1986, Intel broke an agreement it had with AMD to allow them to produce Intel's microchips for IBM; AMD filed for arbitration in 1987 and the arbitrator decided in AMD's favor in 1992.
AMD64 (also variously referred to by AMD in their literature and documentation as “AMD 64-bit Technology” and “AMD x86-64 Architecture”) was created as an alternative to the radically different IA-64 architecture designed by Intel and Hewlett-Packard, which was backward-incompatible with IA-32, the 32-bit version of the x86 architecture.
The performance of the 45 W A8-7600 Kaveri APU was found to be similar to that of the 100 W Richland part, leading to the claim that AMD made significant improvements in on-die graphics performance per watt; [63] however, CPU performance was found to lag behind similarly specified Intel processors, a lag that was unlikely to be resolved in the ...