When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. California companies wrote their own gig worker law, but ...

    www.aol.com/california-companies-wrote-own-gig...

    Those cases predate Prop. 22, originating during a period when gig workers were misclassified and should have been considered employees under California law, the labor commissioner argues in the ...

  3. Uber loses California gig work law challenge - AOL

    www.aol.com/uber-loses-california-gig-law...

    A federal appeals court in California ruled Uber’s challenge to a state law aimed at making transportation gig workers employees instead of independent contractors cannot go forward, handing a ...

  4. I Was Late For Work With No Excuse And Was Fired And Now I ...

    www.aol.com/news/2014-03-11-fired-for-lateness...

    I was recently terminated from my job because I was late. I did not give an excuse or a reason for my lateness. I called before my shift was scheduled to alert a manager of my lateness & nobody ...

  5. California Department of Fair Employment and Housing v ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Department_of...

    The lawsuit also alleges they had to work much harder to be promoted, or were passed over entirely. Some women employees reported being denied promotions due to fears they might become pregnant, being reprimanded for needing to go pick up their children, and being kicked out of lactation rooms by male colleagues who wanted to meet in the room. [1]

  6. California Assembly Bill 5 (2019) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Assembly_Bill_5...

    The reason given is: The information is accurate but obsolete. In 2020, AB 5 was extensively revised and reintroduced as AB 2257. That bill was written into California law, i.e., codified, late in the year. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (February 2021)

  7. De Havilland Law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Law

    The De Havilland Law, [1] formally De Haviland v. Warner Bros. Pictures, is a published judicial opinion interpreting California Labor Code Section 2855, [2] a California law which prevents a court from enforcing specific performance of an exclusive personal services contract (i.e., contracts creating a non-delegable duty on the part of an individual to another party, and no other, to render ...

  8. California fines Amazon nearly $6M, alleging illegal work ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-fines-amazon-nearly...

    California has fined Amazon a total of $5.9 million, alleging the e-commerce giant worked warehouse employees so hard that it put their safety at risk, officials said Tuesday. The two citations ...

  9. Private Attorneys General Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Attorneys_General_Act

    The Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) is a California statute that authorizes aggrieved employees to bring actions for civil penalties on behalf of themselves, other employees, and the State of California against their employers for California Labor Code violations. [1]