Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A variety of source types will be appropriate for most articles, and the type of source appropriate in one part of an article may be different from the type of source that is appropriate for a different part of the article. It is a third-party or independent source, with no significant financial or other conflict of interest.
Dictionaries and encyclopedias: reference works containing multiple entries for different words or topics. Wikipedia is an example of an encyclopedia. Archival and other primary sources: historic documents. This page outlines appropriate use of primary sources. Magazine articles: short papers in popular or trade publications.
The use of the slash before the > means that the tag is self-closing, and the </ref> used to close other references must not be used in addition. The text of the name can be almost anything—apart from being completely numeric. If spaces are used in the text of the name, the text must be placed within double quotes. Placing all named ...
Their use is generally discouraged" along the lines of "the use of sources that have not been peer-reviewed is akin to a blog and their use is generally discouraged" (i.e., interpreting it as text about other sorts of sources, not limited to preprints or non-peer-reviewed scholarship more generally, as is the case with some conference proceedings).
The only way to ensure the article faithfully reflects the information in high quality sources is to read and understand the cited sources and perhaps others. Often at the least a Wikipedia article will be an excellent overview of a given subject, making it easier to understand the cited sources and know what type of information to look for.
Tertiary sources are publications such as encyclopedias and other compendia that summarize primary and secondary sources. Wikipedia is a bad source. While it is a tertiary source, Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source for Wikipedia articles. Tertiary sources can provide a valuable overview of a topic, but often oversimplify complex ...
Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to distinguished professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea.
The guideline does not apply to quotations, which should be faithfully reproduced from the original sources (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style § Quotations). If you do not feel you can improve the problematic wording of an article yourself, a template message can be added to draw the attention of other editors to an article needing a cleanup.