When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Daily Mail - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail

    In February 2017, pursuant to a formal community discussion, editors on the English Wikipedia banned the use of the Daily Mail as a source in most cases. [25] [26] [27] Its use as a reference is now "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist", [17] [25] [249] and it can no longer be used as proof of notability. [25]

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    The Daily Mail may be used in rare cases in an about-self fashion. Some editors regard the Daily Mail as reliable historically, so old articles may be used in a historical context. (Note that dailymail.co.uk is not trustworthy as a source of past content that was printed in the Daily Mail.)

  4. MailOnline - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MailOnline

    MailOnline (also known as dailymail.co.uk and dailymail.com outside the UK) is the website of the Daily Mail, a tabloid newspaper in the United Kingdom, and of its sister paper The Mail on Sunday. MailOnline is a division of dmg media, which is owned by Daily Mail and General Trust plc.

  5. Wikipedia : Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 255

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DAILYMAIL2

    The bottom line is: the Daily Mail is not reliable. It should not be used as a reliable source. Some people in this argument bring up public trust or distrust; this is not relevant because facts are not the same as public opinion. The Daily Mail has done a good job of hoodwinking its audience into believing its crackpot hoaxes are good ...

  6. Wikipedia : Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 220

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DAILYMAILRFC

    Make no mistake, The Daily Mail is a bad source. But in the realm of mass media, most sources of the junk food news variety seem very bad. And these can be published by supposedly reliable news outlets. I would much rather see this more firmly clarified in policy. The Daily Mail is a bad source, and everybody knows it. But other outlets, even ...

  7. Wikipedia:Deprecated sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deprecated_sources

    The Daily Mail may be used in rare cases in an about-self fashion. Some editors regard the Daily Mail as reliable historically, so old articles may be used in a historical context. (Note that dailymail.co.uk is not trustworthy as a source of past content that was printed in the Daily Mail.)

  8. Wikipedia : Wikipedia Signpost/2017-02-27/In the media

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia...

    In January 2017, an RfC (Request for Comment) discussion was proposed to evaluate the use of the Daily Mail as a reliable source on English Wikipedia. This is one of many community discussions that take place every day about a broad range of issues, including reliable sources.

  9. List of newspapers in the United Kingdom by circulation

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the...

    The first national halfpenny paper was the Daily Mail [1] (followed by the Daily Express and the Daily Mirror), which became the first weekday paper to sell one million copies around 1911. Circulation continued to increase, reaching a peak in the mid-1950s; [ 2 ] sales of the News of the World reached a peak of more than eight million in 1950.