When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Self-Incrimination clause provides various protections against self-incrimination, including the right of an individual not to serve as a witness in a criminal case in which he or she is a defendant. "Pleading the Fifth" is a colloquial term often used to invoke the Self-Incrimination Clause when witnesses decline to answer questions where ...

  3. Self-incrimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-incrimination

    In criminal law, self-incrimination is the act of making a statement that exposes oneself to an accusation of criminal liability or prosecution. [1] Self-incrimination can occur either directly or indirectly: directly, by means of interrogation where information of a self-incriminatory nature is disclosed; or indirectly, when information of a self-incriminatory nature is disclosed voluntarily ...

  4. Pennsylvania v. Muniz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_v._Muniz

    Muniz, 496 US 582 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the Self-incrimination Clause of the 5th Amendment and the meaning of “testimonial” under the 5th Amendment. A drunk-driving suspect, Muniz, made several incriminating statements while in police custody, and the Supreme Court held that only one of these statements was ...

  5. Right to silence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_silence

    It is well established that the Right against self incrimination has been granted to the accused by virtue of the pronouncement in the case of Nandini Sathpathy vs P. L. Dani, no one can forcibly extract statements from the accused, who has the right against self incrimination, not only in the court of law but also during interrogation. [33]

  6. Williams v. Florida - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_v._Florida

    Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fifth Amendment does not entitle a defendant in a criminal trial to refuse to provide details of his alibi witnesses to the prosecution, and that the Sixth Amendment does not require a jury to have 12 members.

  7. Bill Clinton discharged from hospital after being treated for flu

    www.aol.com/news/bill-clinton-admitted-hospital...

    Using the Fifth Amendment, which gives Americans the right to not self-incriminate themselves, Epstein refused to answer at least three questions related to former President Bill Clinton and at ...

  8. Haynes v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haynes_v._United_States

    Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court decision interpreting the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution's self-incrimination clause. [1] Haynes extended the Fifth Amendment protections elucidated in Marchetti v. United States. [2] [3]

  9. Biden says Equal Rights Amendment should be considered ...

    www.aol.com/news/biden-says-equal-rights...

    President Joe Biden on Friday said the Equal Right Amendment should be considered ratified, but is stopping short of taking any action on the matter in his final days in office. "I have supported ...