When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wilks's lambda distribution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilks's_lambda_distribution

    Computations or tables of the Wilks' distribution for higher dimensions are not readily available and one usually resorts to approximations. One approximation is attributed to M. S. Bartlett and works for large m [2] allows Wilks' lambda to be approximated with a chi-squared distribution

  3. Standard normal table - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_normal_table

    Example: To find 0.69, one would look down the rows to find 0.6 and then across the columns to 0.09 which would yield a probability of 0.25490 for a cumulative from mean table or 0.75490 from a cumulative table. To find a negative value such as -0.83, one could use a cumulative table for negative z-values [3] which yield a probability of 0.20327.

  4. Coefficient of determination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_determination

    Ordinary least squares regression of Okun's law.Since the regression line does not miss any of the points by very much, the R 2 of the regression is relatively high.. In statistics, the coefficient of determination, denoted R 2 or r 2 and pronounced "R squared", is the proportion of the variation in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable(s).

  5. Statistical significance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_significance

    Additionally, the change to 0.005 would increase the likelihood of false negatives, whereby the effect being studied is real, but the test fails to show it. [ 63 ] In 2019, over 800 statisticians and scientists signed a message calling for the abandonment of the term "statistical significance" in science, [ 64 ] and the ASA published a further ...

  6. Contingency table - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contingency_table

    C suffers from the disadvantage that it does not reach a maximum of 1.0, notably the highest it can reach in a 2 × 2 table is 0.707 . It can reach values closer to 1.0 in contingency tables with more categories; for example, it can reach a maximum of 0.870 in a 4 × 4 table.

  7. Normality test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normality_test

    Simple back-of-the-envelope test takes the sample maximum and minimum and computes their z-score, or more properly t-statistic (number of sample standard deviations that a sample is above or below the sample mean), and compares it to the 68–95–99.7 rule: if one has a 3σ event (properly, a 3s event) and substantially fewer than 300 samples, or a 4s event and substantially fewer than 15,000 ...

  8. Point-biserial correlation coefficient - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point-biserial_correlation...

    Further, n 1 is the number of data points in group 1, n 0 is the number of data points in group 2 and n is the total sample size. This formula is a computational formula that has been derived from the formula for r XY in order to reduce steps in the calculation; it is easier to compute than r XY. There is an equivalent formula that uses s n−1:

  9. p-value - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value

    The 0.05 value (equivalent to 1/20 chances) was originally proposed by R. Fisher in 1925 in his famous book entitled "Statistical Methods for Research Workers". [9] In 2018, a group of statisticians led by Daniel Benjamin proposed the adoption of the 0.005 value as standard value for statistical significance worldwide.