Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Argument from incredulity, also known as argument from personal incredulity, appeal to common sense, or the divine fallacy, [1] is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition must be false because it contradicts one's personal expectations or beliefs, or is difficult to imagine.
The person making the argument expects that the listener will accept the provided definition, making the argument difficult to refute. [19] Divine fallacy (argument from incredulity) – arguing that, because something is so phenomenal or amazing, it must be the result of superior, divine, alien or paranormal agency. [20]
Argument from ignorance (Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), or appeal to ignorance, [a] is an informal fallacy where something is claimed to be true or false because ...
Argument from incredulity; Argumentum ad baculum; Argumentum ad captandum; Argumentum e contrario; Attack ad; B. Begging the question; Blind men and an elephant; C ...
Argument from incredulity From an alternative name : This is a redirect from a title that is another name or identity such as an alter ego, a nickname, or a synonym of the target, or of a name associated with the target.
3.1 Argument from incredulity/Lack of imagination. 3.2 Argument from self-knowing (auto-epistemic) 4 Distinguishing absence of evidence from evidence of absence.
Sometimes it is mistaken for an argument from ignorance, which is non-proof and a logical fallacy Topics referred to by the same term This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Proving a negative .
The term God-of-the-gaps fallacy can refer to a position that assumes an act of God as the explanation for an unknown phenomenon, which according to the users of the term, is a variant of an argument from ignorance fallacy. [17] [18] Such an argument is sometimes reduced to the following form: