Ad
related to: cat leaning to one side for no apparent reason meaning in law
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Cat's Paw theory is a legal doctrine in employment discrimination cases that derives its name from the fable "The Monkey and the Cat," attributed to Jean de La Fontaine. In the fable, a cunning monkey persuades a naïve cat to retrieve chestnuts from a fire, with the cat ultimately burning its paws while the monkey enjoys the chestnuts. [ 1 ]
The falling cat problem has elicited interest from scientists including George Gabriel Stokes, James Clerk Maxwell, and Étienne-Jules Marey.In a letter to his wife, Katherine Mary Clerk Maxwell, Maxwell wrote, "There is a tradition in Trinity that when I was here I discovered a method of throwing a cat so as not to light on its feet, and that I used to throw cats out of windows.
when the reason for a law ceases, so does the law itself Herbert Broom′s text of 1858 on legal maxims lists the phrase under the heading ″Rules of logic″, stating: Reason is the soul of the law, and when the reason of any particular law ceases, so does the law itself. [9] ceteris paribus: with other things the same
Some cats dislike peeing in the same box they poop in. Adding an additional litter box gives cats the option of peeing in one and pooping in another—or at least they can pick another box if, for ...
With all their sweat glands, feet probably smell quite a lot like ‘comforting human’ to our feline friends, meaning your cat is more than happy to cuddle up close! 5. You like it
ordinance's definition of loitering as "to remain in any one place with no apparent purpose" does not give people adequate notice of what is prohibited and what is permitted, even if a person does not violate the law until he refuses to disperse.
Whiskers are sensitive and help cats understand their environment, but they do not match the cat’s body size, and cats don’t use them to determine whether they can fit through narrow spaces ...
The law, which defined loitering as "remain[ing] in any one place with no apparent purpose", gave police officers a right to disperse such persons. In cases of disobedience, the law provided a punishment by fine, imprisonment, and/or community service. It was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court of the United States (Chicago v.