Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The rule in Dearle v Hall (1828) 3 Russ 1 is an English common law rule to determine priority between competing equitable claims to the same asset. The rule broadly provides that where the equitable owner of an asset purports to dispose of his equitable interest on two or more occasions, and the equities are equal between claimants, the claimant who first notifies the trustee or legal owner of ...
Shareholder primacy is a theory in corporate governance holding that shareholder interests should be assigned first priority relative to all other stakeholders. A shareholder primacy approach often gives shareholders power to intercede directly and frequently in corporate decision-making, through such means as unilateral shareholder power to amend corporate charters, shareholder referendums on ...
Priority setting is influenced by time, money, and expertise. [4] A risk priority number assessment is one way to establish priorities that may be difficult to establish in a health care setting. [5] Software has been designed to assist professionals in establishing priorities in a specific business setting. [6]
priority, which is an ordering of competing security interests in same asset. The same rule – the common law rule in Dearle v Hall, for instance – may govern both perfection against third parties (e.g., subsequent security holders) and prioritization of competing security interests.
The MoSCoW method is a prioritization technique used in management, business analysis, project management, and software development to reach a common understanding with stakeholders on the importance they place on the delivery of each requirement; it is also known as MoSCoW prioritization or MoSCoW analysis.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Prioritarianism is a portmanteau of "priority" and "utilitarianism.". While common forms of utilitarianism view the consequences of an action as having equal moral weight regardless of the person who experiences those consequences, [8] prioritarianism dictates that the consequences of an action should be weighted differently depending on how relatively advantaged the bearer of the consequence ...
Maxims of equity are legal maxims that serve as a set of general principles or rules which are said to govern the way in which equity operates. They tend to illustrate the qualities of equity, in contrast to the common law, as a more flexible, responsive approach to the needs of the individual, inclined to take into account the parties' conduct and worthiness.