When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: examples of justice in research articles of incorporation in ohio free search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Free Speech: 354 U.S. 298 (1957) free speech, distinction between expression of opinion and advocacy of action Morey v. Doud: 354 U.S. 457 (1957) States do not have power to make special exemptions in legislation for particular actors (overruled by City of New Orleans v. Dukes) Roth v. United States: Free Speech: 354 U.S. 476 (1957) obscenity ...

  3. Ker v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ker_v._California

    The Court had decided two years earlier in Mapp v.Ohio that evidence seized in the course of an illegal search was inadmissible in a criminal trial in a state court. The Court extended that holding in this case, addressing the standard for deciding what are the fruits of an illegal search in state criminal trials.

  4. Justice (research) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice_(research)

    In research ethics, justice regards fairness in the distribution of burdens and benefits of research. For example, justice is a consideration in recruiting volunteer research participants, in considering any existing burdens the groups from which they are recruited face (such as historic marginalisation) and the risks of the research, alongside the potential benefits of the research.

  5. Personal jurisdiction in Internet cases in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_jurisdiction_in...

    1. Patterson purposefully and repeatedly dealt with an Ohio company. 2. Patterson's CompuServe-based software sales, and CompuServe's alleged infringement occurred in Ohio where CompuServe was based. 3. Patterson's business contract with CompuServe should have given him notice that he might be required to answer lawsuits in Ohio.

  6. Mapp v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government.

  7. Model Business Corporation Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_Business_Corporation_Act

    The current MBCA permits the articles of incorporation or the bylaws of a corporation to specify the forum or forums for litigation involving internal corporate affairs. Venue for Judicial Proceedings. Recognizing that many states have developed specialized “business courts” that may be more appropriate venues for business litigation, the ...