Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Robertson–Seymour theorem states that finite undirected graphs and graph minors form a well-quasi-ordering. The graph minor relationship does not contain any infinite descending chain, because each contraction or deletion reduces the number of edges and vertices of the graph (a non-negative integer). [8]
An edge contraction is an operation that removes an edge from a graph while simultaneously merging the two vertices it used to connect. An undirected graph H is a minor of another undirected graph G if a graph isomorphic to H can be obtained from G by contracting some edges, deleting some edges, and deleting some isolated vertices.
A minor of a graph G is any graph H that is isomorphic to a graph that can be obtained from a subgraph of G by contracting some edges. If G does not have a graph H as a minor, then we say that G is H-free. Let H be a fixed graph. Intuitively, if G is a huge H-free graph, then there ought to be a "good reason" for this.
The Robertson–Seymour theorem proves that subcubic graphs (simple or not) are well-founded by homeomorphic embeddability, implying such a sequence cannot be infinite. Then, by applying Kőnig's lemma on the tree of such sequences under extension, for each value of k there is a sequence with maximal length.
By Robertson–Seymour theorem, any set of finite graphs contains only a finite number of minor-minimal elements. In particular, the set of "yes" instances has a finite number of minor-minimal elements. Given an input graph G, the following "algorithm" solves the above problem: For every minor-minimal element H: If H is a minor of G then return ...
Graph minor Wagner's theorem: Outerplanar graphs: K 4 and K 2,3: Graph minor Diestel (2000), [1] p. 107: Outer 1-planar graphs: Six forbidden minors Graph minor Auer et al. (2013) [2] Graphs of fixed genus: A finite obstruction set Graph minor Diestel (2000), [1] p. 275: Apex graphs: A finite obstruction set Graph minor [3] Linklessly ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Finite graphs ordered by a notion of embedding called "graph minor" is a well-quasi-order (Robertson–Seymour theorem). Graphs of finite tree-depth ordered by the induced subgraph relation form a well-quasi-order, [3] as do the cographs ordered by induced subgraphs. [4]