Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The two are not equivalent for the deterministic pushdown automaton (although they are for the non-deterministic pushdown automaton). The languages accepted by empty stack are those languages that are accepted by final state and are prefix-free: no word in the language is the prefix of another word in the language. [2] [3]
A diagram of a pushdown automaton. A finite-state machine just looks at the input signal and the current state: it has no stack to work with, and therefore is unable to access previous values of the input. It can only choose a new state, the result of following the transition. A pushdown automaton (PDA) differs from a finite state machine in ...
Nested words over the alphabet = {,, …,} can be encoded into "ordinary" words over the tagged alphabet ^, in which each symbol a from Σ has three tagged counterparts: the symbol a for encoding a call position in a nested word labelled with a, the symbol a for encoding a return position labelled with a, and finally the symbol a itself for representing an internal position labelled with a.
Deterministic: For a given current state and an input symbol, if an automaton can only jump to one and only one state then it is a deterministic automaton. Nondeterministic : An automaton that, after reading an input symbol, may jump into any of a number of states, as licensed by its transition relation.
The notion of the DCFL is closely related to the deterministic pushdown automaton (DPDA). It is where the language power of pushdown automata is reduced to if we make them deterministic; the pushdown automata become unable to choose between different state-transition alternatives and as a consequence cannot recognize all context-free languages. [1]
Regular languages are a category of languages (sometimes termed Chomsky Type 3) which can be matched by a state machine (more specifically, by a deterministic finite automaton or a nondeterministic finite automaton) constructed from a regular expression. In particular, a regular language can match constructs like "A follows B", "Either A or B ...
A bottom-up finite tree automaton over F is defined as a tuple (Q, F, Q f, Δ), where Q is a set of states, F is a ranked alphabet (i.e., an alphabet whose symbols have an associated arity), Q f ⊆ Q is a set of final states, and Δ is a set of transition rules of the form f(q 1 (x 1),...,q n (x n)) → q(f(x 1,...,x n)), for an n-ary f ∈ F, q, q i ∈ Q, and x i variables denoting subtrees.
Deterministic context-free grammars were particularly useful because they could be parsed sequentially by a deterministic pushdown automaton, which was a requirement due to computer memory constraints. [4] In 1965, Donald Knuth invented the LR(k) parser and proved that there exists an LR(k) grammar for every deterministic context-free language. [5]