Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Strength-based practice is a social work practice theory that emphasizes people's self-determination and strengths. It is a philosophy and a way of viewing clients (originally psychological patients, but in an extended sense also employees, colleagues or other persons) as resourceful and resilient in the face of adversity. [ 1 ]
Planning Alternative Tomorrows with Hope (PATH) is a strengths-based person-centred planning process developed by John O'Brien, Marsha Forest and Jack Pearpoint.The PATH process is designed to help a focus person establish their own vision for their life and imagine what supports and connections will help them achieve this vision.
Community Skills: lists the community work in which a person has participated to determine future work they may be interested in. Enterprising Interests and Experience: lists past experience in business and determines interest in starting a business. Personal Information: lists minimum information for follow-up.
SFBT is strengths-based [9] [18] and supports clients' self-determination. [12] Using the client's language, SFBT uses the client's perspective [12] and fosters cooperation. [19] The focus on the strengths and resources of clients is a factor in why some social workers choose SFBT. [20]
SWOT analysis provides direction to the next stages of the change process. [19] It has been used by community organizers and community members to further social justice in the context of social work practice, [19] and can be applied directly to communities served by a specific nonprofit or community organization. [20]
A Personal practice model (PPM) is a social work tool for understanding and linking theories to each other and to the practical tasks of social work. Mullen [1] describes the PPM as “the art and science of social work”, or more prosaically, “an explicit conceptual scheme that expresses a worker's view of practice”. A worker should ...
Upgrade to a faster, more secure version of a supported browser. It's free and it only takes a few moments:
the anticipation of process and effect evaluation. Intervention mapping is characterized by three perspectives: an ecological approach, participation of all stakeholders, and the use of theories and evidence. Although intervention mapping is presented as a series of steps, the authors see the planning process as iterative rather than linear. [1]