Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A disabled man living on a low, fixed income with no bank account walked into a Tri-Cities car dealership in June 2021. He drove off in a used Toyota RAV4 after signing a sales agreement packed ...
Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd [1965] EWCA Civ 2 is an English contract law case, concerning the difference between a representation and a contract term. It shows that a bona fide consumer is entitled to rely on the word of a dealer (who is naturally presumed to be an expert).
Texas law states "Except as provided by this section, a manufacturer or distributor may not directly or indirectly:(1) own an interest in a franchised or nonfranchised dealer or dealership;(2) operate or control a franchised or nonfranchised dealer or dealership; or(3) act in the capacity of a franchised or nonfranchised dealer.
E McKendrick, Contract Law (8th edn Palgrave, London 2009) ch 13; E Peel, Treitel: The Law of Contract (7th edn Thompson, London 2008) ch 9; M Chen-Wishart, Contract Law (6th edn OUP 2018) ch 5; Articles. PS Atiyah and G Treitel, 'Misrepresentation Act 1967' (1967) 30 MLR 369; PS Atiyah, 'Res Ipsa Loquitur in England and Australia' (1972) 35 ...
In August 2007, Galin Frye was arrested and charged with driving without a license for the third time, making it a felony in Missouri.The prosecutor in the case sent Frye's attorney two plea offers; one to recommend a three-year sentence with Frye serving only ten days in jail if he pleaded guilty to the felony, and the second to reduce the felony to a misdemeanor, and Frye to serve 90 days in ...
The False Promise of Driverless Cars Sarah Kim ... “I put forth to the public this, an omni-solution, the CR. A green car, a privacy machine, an end to misinformation, a pledge for justice ...
The General Motors streetcar conspiracy refers to the convictions of General Motors (GM) and related companies that were involved in the monopolizing of the sale of buses and supplies to National City Lines (NCL) and subsidiaries, as well as to the allegations that the defendants conspired to own or control transit systems, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
The leading case in English law is Derry v.Peek, [2] which was decided before the development of the law on negligent misstatement. In Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v.Heller & Partners Ltd it was decided that people who make statements which they ought to have known were untrue because they were negligent, can in some circumstances, to restricted groups of claimants be liable to make compensation for ...