Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The complexity of an elementary function is equivalent to that of its inverse, since all elementary functions are analytic and hence invertible by means of Newton's method. In particular, if either exp {\displaystyle \exp } or log {\displaystyle \log } in the complex domain can be computed with some complexity, then that complexity is ...
A common case is finding the inverse of a low-rank update A + UCV of A (where U only has a few columns and V only a few rows), or finding an approximation of the inverse of the matrix A + B where the matrix B can be approximated by a low-rank matrix UCV, for example using the singular value decomposition.
In mathematics, and in particular linear algebra, the Moore–Penrose inverse + of a matrix , often called the pseudoinverse, is the most widely known generalization of the inverse matrix. [1] It was independently described by E. H. Moore in 1920, [2] Arne Bjerhammar in 1951, [3] and Roger Penrose in 1955. [4]
A matrix (in this case the right-hand side of the Sherman–Morrison formula) is the inverse of a matrix (in this case +) if and only if = =. We first verify that the right hand side ( Y {\displaystyle Y} ) satisfies X Y = I {\displaystyle XY=I} .
The group inverse can be defined, equivalently, by the properties AA # A = A, A # AA # = A #, and AA # = A # A. A projection matrix P, defined as a matrix such that P 2 = P, has index 1 (or 0) and has Drazin inverse P D = P. If A is a nilpotent matrix (for example a shift matrix), then = The hyper-power sequence is
This leads to the equivalent characterization: a matrix Q is orthogonal if its transpose is equal to its inverse: =, where Q −1 is the inverse of Q. An orthogonal matrix Q is necessarily invertible (with inverse Q −1 = Q T), unitary (Q −1 = Q ∗), where Q ∗ is the Hermitian adjoint (conjugate transpose) of Q, and therefore normal (Q ...
Although an explicit inverse is not necessary to estimate the vector of unknowns, it is the easiest way to estimate their accuracy and os found in the diagonal of a matrix inverse (the posterior covariance matrix of the vector of unknowns). However, faster algorithms to compute only the diagonal entries of a matrix inverse are known in many cases.
When solving systems of equations, b is usually treated as a vector with a length equal to the height of matrix A. In matrix inversion however, instead of vector b, we have matrix B, where B is an n-by-p matrix, so that we are trying to find a matrix X (also a n-by-p matrix): = =.