When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Active–stative alignment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active–stative_alignment

    In linguistic typology, active–stative alignment (also split intransitive alignment or semantic alignment) is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the sole argument ("subject") of an intransitive clause (often symbolized as S) is sometimes marked in the same way as an agent of a transitive verb (that is, like a subject such as "I" or "she" in English) but other times in the same way ...

  3. Morphosyntactic alignment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphosyntactic_alignment

    The direct, tripartite, and transitive alignment types are all quite rare. The alignment types other than Austronesian alignment can be shown graphically like this: In addition, in some languages, both nominative–accusative and ergative–absolutive systems may be used, split between different grammatical contexts, called split ergativity.

  4. Tripartite alignment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripartite_alignment

    In linguistic typology, tripartite alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the main argument ('subject') of an intransitive verb, the agent argument ('subject') of a transitive verb, and the patient argument ('direct object') of a transitive verb are each treated distinctly in the grammatical system of a language. [1]

  5. Split ergativity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split_ergativity

    In linguistic typology, split ergativity is a feature of certain languages where some constructions use ergative syntax and morphology, but other constructions show another pattern, usually nominative–accusative. The conditions in which ergative constructions are used vary among different languages.

  6. Ergative–absolutive alignment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergative–absolutive...

    Many languages have ergative–absolutive alignment only in some parts of their grammar (e.g., in the case marking of nouns), but nominative-accusative alignment in other parts (e.g., in the case marking of pronouns, or in person agreement). This is known as split ergativity.

  7. Word order - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_order

    In linguistics, word order (also known as linear order) is the order of the syntactic constituents of a language. Word order typology studies it from a cross-linguistic perspective, and examines how languages employ different orders. Correlations between orders found in different syntactic sub-domains are also of interest.

  8. Object–subject word order - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object–subject_word_order

    In linguistic typology, object–subject (OS) word order, also called O-before-S or patient–agent word order, is a word order in which the object appears before the subject. OS is notable for its statistical rarity as a default or predominant word order among natural languages . [ 1 ]

  9. Nominative–absolutive alignment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominative–absolutive...

    In the Northern Jê language Canela, different main clause constructions present different combinations of alignment patterns, including split-S (default), ergative–absolutive (recent past), and nominative–absolutive (evaluative, progressive, continuous, completive, and negated clauses). An example of the latter alignment type is given below.