Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
clone pull push branch – commit –branch clone/open update N/A add rm/del mv/rename N/A merge commit revert Fossil's repository is single sqlite file itself N/A Git: init – init –bare clone – clone –bare fetch push branch checkout pull N/A add rm mv cp [then] git add [nb 67] merge commit reset –hard bundle rebase Mercurial: init ...
Git supports rapid branching and merging, and includes specific tools for visualizing and navigating a non-linear development history. In Git, a core assumption is that a change will be merged more often than it is written, as it is passed around to various reviewers. In Git, branches are very lightweight: a branch is only a reference to one ...
The users of the version control system can branch any branch. Branches are also known as trees, streams or codelines. The originating branch is sometimes called the parent branch, the upstream branch (or simply upstream, especially if the branches are maintained by different organizations or individuals), or the backing stream.
Working copies effectively function as remote backups, which avoids relying on one physical machine as a single point of failure. [5] Allows various development models to be used, such as using development branches or a Commander/Lieutenant model. [6] Permits centralized control of the "release version" of the project [citation needed]
Revision Control System (RCS) [open, shared] – stores the latest version and backward deltas for the fastest access to the trunk tip [4] [5] compared to SCCS and an improved user interface, [6] at the cost of slow branch tip access and missing support for included/excluded deltas
Version control (also known as revision control, source control, and source code management) is the software engineering practice of controlling, organizing, and tracking different versions in history of computer files; primarily source code text files, but generally any type of file.
With split repositories, you fetch only the project you are interested in by default. With a monorepo, you check out all projects by default. This can take up a significant amount of storage space. While some versioning systems have a mechanism to do a partial checkout, [15] [16] [17] doing so defeats some of the advantages of a monorepo.
For instance, a released version of the software project may form one branch, used for bug fixes, while a version under current development, with major changes and new features, can form a separate branch. CVS assumes that the majority of work takes place on the trunk, and that branches should generally be short-lived or historical.