Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Vehicular Parking Ltd. [1] is a patent–antitrust case in which the United States Government eroded the doctrine of United States v. General Electric Co. [2] permitting patentees to fix licensee prices, but failed to persuade the court to decree royalty-free licensing as a remedy.
General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125 (1976), is a 1976 United States Supreme Court case authored by Chief Justice William Rehnquist concerning gender-based discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In a 6–3 decision, the Court held that pregnancy could reasonably be excluded from an employer's disability ...
The Hawthorne effect is a type of human behavior reactivity in which individuals modify an aspect of their behavior in response to their awareness of being observed. [1] [2] The effect was discovered in the context of research conducted at the Hawthorne Western Electric plant; however, some scholars think the descriptions are fictitious.
United States v. General Electric Co., 272 U.S. 476 (1926), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding (per Chief Justice Taft) that a patentee who has granted a single license to a competitor to manufacture the patented product may lawfully fix the price at which the licensee may sell the product.
General-Electric's infrastructure is second to none. There are more than 10,000 GE gas turbines generating electricity worldwide, and the company is hard at work perfecting the "industrial ...
General Electric Co." entirely. [17] In the 1926 General Electric case, the Court followed Bement v. National Harrow Co., [18] decided in 1902, and it sustained a price-fixing provision of a license to make and vend the patented invention. "By that decision, price-fixing combinations which are outlawed by the Sherman Act . . . were held to be ...
Fonar Corp. v. General Electric Co., 107 F.3d 1543 (Fed. Cir. 1997), [1] was a case decided in 1997 by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concerning source code and the disclosure requirement for software patents.
General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997), was a Supreme Court of the United States case between Robert Joiner and General Electric Co. that concerned whether the abuse of discretion standard is the correct standard an appellate court should apply in reviewing a trial court's decision to admit or exclude expert testimony. [1]