Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Disorder may occur in the dimensions of person, occupation or environment, or when the momentum of experience is lost due to unresolved issues. [2] Intervention aims to improve transactions between person, occupation and environment, through the process of enablement rather than treatment.
Occupational science, the study of occupation, was founded in 1989 by Elizabeth Yerxa at the University of Southern California as an academic discipline to provide foundational research on occupation to support and advance the practice of occupation-based occupational therapy, as well as offer a basic science to study topics surrounding ...
This model was expanded into the demand-control-support model that suggests that the combination of high control and high social support at work buffers the effects of high demands. [ 60 ] As a work demand, workload is also relevant to the job demands-resources model of stress that suggests that jobs are stressful when demands (e.g., workload ...
The role of the pediatric occupational therapist is to support the child in any environment in which the child is not able to carry out the desired occupations. The most common areas of practice for a pediatric occupational therapist include: neonatal intensive care units (NICU), early intervention, schools, and outpatient services.
Occupational Therapists (OT) address substance use through focus on self-care, leisure, and productivity, [3] and may encounter SUD in a variety of settings. OTs address substance use by determining occupational needs, executing assessments and interventions, and creating appropriate prevention programs. [1]
Occupational science evolved as a loosely organized effort by many scholars in different disciplines to understand human time use. It was named and given additional impetus in 1989 by a team of faculty at the University of Southern California (USC) led by Dr. Elizabeth Yerxa, [3] who had been influenced by the work of graduate students under the supervision of Mary Reilly at the same university.
Secondary prevention strategies involve around 10–15% of the school population who do not respond to the primary prevention strategies and are at risk for academic failure or behavior problems but are not in need of individual support. [15] Interventions at the secondary level often are delivered in small groups to maximize time and effort ...
The rationale of response to intervention is to provide all students the additional time and support necessary to learn and perform at high levels. [8] The RTI process within MTSS can help to identify students who are at-risk, inform any adjustments needed to the instruction, monitor students' progress, and inform other necessary interventions.v