Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
This makes the process more complicated since each participant acts both as sender and receiver. For many forms of communication, feedback is of vital importance, for example, to assess the effect of the communication on the audience. [17] [12] However, it does not carry the same weight in the case of mass communication. Some theorists argue ...
[157] [153] Generally speaking, the more source and receiver are alike in regard to these factors, the more likely successful communication is. [142] [151] [153] Communication may fail, for example, if the receiver lacks the decoding skills necessary to understand the message or if the source has a demeaning attitude toward the receiver. [158 ...
The communication skills required for successful communication are different for source and receiver. For the source, this includes the ability to express oneself or to encode the message in an accessible way. [8] Communication starts with a specific purpose and encoding skills are necessary to express this purpose in the form of a message.
An example of this would involve how communication interactions with men will often involve them using interruptions as a controlling communication behavior. [42] However, one study found that "people accommodate their conversants' speech style (more man-like or woman-like) more than to their actual gender". [ 43 ]
[12] [10] Shannon and Weaver hold that models of communication should provide good responses to all three problems, ideally by showing how to make communication more accurate and efficient. [10] The prime focus of their model is the technical level, which concerns the issue of how to accurately reproduce a message from one location to another ...
Exploratory affective stage: communication styles become somewhat more friendly and relaxed. Affective exchange: there is a high amount of open communication between individuals. These relationships typically consist of close friends or even romantic or platonic partners. Stable exchange: continued open and personal types of interaction. [37]
[33] A similarity that the two communication styles share is its influence on social characteristics such as age, gender, social class, and ethnicity. For example, for someone who is older and more experienced within a society, the need for social cues may be higher or lower depending on the communication style.
Grounding in communication has also been described as a mechanistic style of dialogue which can be used to make many predictions about basic language processing. [29] Pickering and Garrod conducted many studies that reveal, when engaging in dialogue, production and comprehension become closely related.