Ad
related to: liability for blocking shared driveway
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In the case of shared driveways, Laura Gunn, a finance expert with FreeAdvice.com, said, “In most cases, shared driveways are subject to an easement that outlines who is responsible for ...
A's driveway leads from the public street, across the first lot and onto the second lot to A's house. A then sells off the first lot but forgets to reserve a driveway easement in the deed. A originally had common ownership of both properties. A also used the driveway during this period. A then severed the land.
driveways, [1] and; store rooms. ... a building's loss factor is the percentage of the building's area shared by tenants or space that are dedicated to the common ...
A diagram of a battle axe block as seen from above. Lot 1 is a regular plot of land while Lot 2 is the corresponding battle axe block located behind it. In real estate, a battle axe block, hammerhead block, [1] hatchet block or flagpole block [2] is a block of land situated behind another, with access to the street through a narrow driveway shared by both properties. [3]
Within the city of Sacramento, a boat can be stored on a driveway if the boat is registered to the current occupant of the premises and functions properly, according to Sacramento City Code 8.04.480.
For instance, they can restrict paint colors, lawn maintenance, and even the cars parked in driveways to maintain an overall visually pleasing appearance. #4 Hoa Bans Non-Citizen Workers Image ...
Strata title schemes are composed of individual lots and common property. Lots are either apartments, garages or storerooms and each is shown on the title as owned by a lot owner. Common property is defined as everything else on the parcel of land that is not comprised in a lot, such as common stairwells, driveways, roofs, gardens and so on.
The doctrine of contributory negligence was dominant in U.S. jurisprudence in the 19th and 20th century. [3] The English case Butterfield v.Forrester is generally recognized as the first appearance, although in this case, the judge held the plaintiff's own negligence undermined their argument that the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury. [3]