Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Provided the floating-point arithmetic is correctly rounded to nearest (with ties resolved any way), as is the default in IEEE 754, and provided the sum does not overflow and, if it underflows, underflows gradually, it can be proven that + = +. [1] [6] [2]
Conversely, given a solution to the SubsetSumZero instance, it must contain the −T (since all integers in S are positive), so to get a sum of zero, it must also contain a subset of S with a sum of +T, which is a solution of the SubsetSumPositive instance. The input integers are positive, and T = sum(S)/2.
Pairwise summation is the default summation algorithm in NumPy [9] and the Julia technical-computing language, [10] where in both cases it was found to have comparable speed to naive summation (thanks to the use of a large base case).
Given such an instance, construct an instance of Partition in which the input set contains the original set plus two elements: z 1 and z 2, with z 1 = sum(S) and z 2 = 2T. The sum of this input set is sum(S) + z 1 + z 2 = 2 sum(S) + 2T, so the target sum for Partition is sum(S) + T. Suppose there exists a solution S′ to the SubsetSum instance
This list of mathematical series contains formulae for finite and infinite sums. It can be used in conjunction with other tools for evaluating sums. Here, is taken to have the value
The Sum and Product Puzzle, also known as the Impossible Puzzle because it seems to lack sufficient information for a solution, is a logic puzzle. It was first published in 1969 by Hans Freudenthal, [1] [2] and the name Impossible Puzzle was coined by Martin Gardner. [3] The puzzle is solvable, though not easily. There exist many similar puzzles.
This method is naturally extended to continuous domains. [2]The method can be also extended to high-dimensional images. [6] If the corners of the rectangle are with in {,}, then the sum of image values contained in the rectangle are computed with the formula {,} ‖ ‖ where () is the integral image at and the image dimension.
Here is a proof that the asymptotic ratio is at most 2. If there is an FF bin with sum less than 1/2, then the size of all remaining items is more than 1/2, so the sum of all following bins is more than 1/2. Therefore, all FF bins except at most one have sum at least 1/2. All optimal bins have sum at most 1, so the sum of all sizes is at most OPT.