Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Robertson–Seymour theorem states that finite undirected graphs and graph minors form a well-quasi-ordering. The graph minor relationship does not contain any infinite descending chain, because each contraction or deletion reduces the number of edges and vertices of the graph (a non-negative integer). [8]
An edge contraction is an operation that removes an edge from a graph while simultaneously merging the two vertices it used to connect. An undirected graph H is a minor of another undirected graph G if a graph isomorphic to H can be obtained from G by contracting some edges, deleting some edges, and deleting some isolated vertices.
In mathematics, a simple subcubic graph (SSCG) is a finite simple graph in which each vertex has a degree of at most three. Suppose we have a sequence of simple subcubic graphs G 1, G 2, ... such that each graph G i has at most i + k vertices (for some integer k) and for no i < j is G i homeomorphically embeddable into (i.e. is a graph minor of) G j.
A minor of a graph G is any graph H that is isomorphic to a graph that can be obtained from a subgraph of G by contracting some edges. If G does not have a graph H as a minor, then we say that G is H-free. Let H be a fixed graph. Intuitively, if G is a huge H-free graph, then there ought to be a "good reason" for this.
In 1993, with Seymour and Robin Thomas, Robertson proved the -free case for which the Hadwiger conjecture relating graph coloring to graph minors is known to be true. [ 8 ] In 1996, Robertson, Seymour, Thomas, and Daniel P. Sanders published a new proof of the four color theorem , [ 9 ] confirming the Appel–Haken proof which until then had ...
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Graph_minors_theorem&oldid=1102375387"
Pages in category "Graph minor theory" The following 33 pages are in this category, out of 33 total. ... Robertson–Seymour theorem; S. Shallow minor; Snark (graph ...
(This example is an adaptation of the graph presented in Bodlaender (1994a), emphasis added) In the first of their famous series of papers on graph minors, Neil Robertson and Paul Seymour define a path-decomposition of a graph G to be a sequence of subsets X i of vertices of G, with two properties: