Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In a clinical trial, the investigators must specify inclusion and exclusion criteria for participation in the study.. Inclusion and exclusion criteria define the characteristics that prospective subjects must have if they are to be included in a study.
In linguistics, clusivity [1] is a grammatical distinction between inclusive and exclusive first-person pronouns and verbal morphology, also called inclusive "we" and exclusive "we". Inclusive "we" specifically includes the addressee, while exclusive "we" specifically excludes the addressee; in other words, two (or more) words that both ...
The management component of the compound idea of inclusive management signifies that inclusion is a managed, ongoing project rather than an attainable state. [3] The inclusion component means something different from the commonplace use of inclusion and exclusion to reference the socioeconomic diversity of the participants.
Inclusive Christians support these claims by citing certain passages from the Bible. [5] [6] Inclusive theology is rooted in a wider movement called "interfaith" [7] that aims to create unity among various religions. The inclusive interpretation is a minority view in some churches but is considered an official theological doctrine in others.
In the United States, federal laws that pertain to individuals with disabilities aim to create an inclusive environment by promoting mainstreaming, nondiscrimination, reasonable accommodations, and universal design. There are three key federal laws that protect the rights of people with disabilities and attempt to ensure their inclusion in many ...
Because the logical or means a disjunction formula is true when either one or both of its parts are true, it is referred to as an inclusive disjunction. This is in contrast with an exclusive disjunction, which is true when one or the other of the arguments are true, but not both (referred to as exclusive or, or XOR).
The name comes from the idea that the principle is based on over-generous inclusion, followed by compensating exclusion. This concept is attributed to Abraham de Moivre (1718), [ 1 ] although it first appears in a paper of Daniel da Silva (1854) [ 2 ] and later in a paper by J. J. Sylvester (1883). [ 3 ]
Presence or absence of distinction between inclusive and exclusive we; Presence or absence of distinction between inalienable possession and alienable possession; Presence or absence of numerical classifiers; Presence or absence of noun classes (such as grammatical gender or animacy)