Ad
related to: los angeles court summary
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County is the California Superior Court located in Los Angeles County. It is the largest single unified trial court in the United States. The Superior Court operates 36 courthouses throughout the county. Currently, the Presiding Judge is Sergio C. Tapia II and David W. Slayton is the Executive Officer/Clerk of ...
It is also the largest single unit trial court in the United States. The Los Angeles County Superior Court is organized into dozens of highly specialized departments, dealing with everything from moving violations to mental health. It handles over 2.5 million legal matters each year, of which about 4,000 terminate in jury trials; this works out ...
Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 568 U.S. 78 (2013), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Natural Resources Defense Council and Santa Monica Baykeeper challenged the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (District) for violating the terms of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit as shown in ...
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Several courts across California lost their phone lines this week after a ransomware attack targeting the state's largest trial court in Los Angeles County. The Superior Court ...
A ransomware attack has shut down the computer system of the largest trial court in the country, officials with the Superior Court of Los Angeles County said. The Superior Court of Los Angeles ...
The Superior Court of Los Angeles County and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest: Citation(s) 4 Cal.5th 903, 416 P.3d 1, 232 Cal.Rptr.3d 1: Case history; Prior history:
After nearly two years of legal back-and-forth over Michael Jackson’s estate, a Los Angeles court has sided with the King of Pop’s estate co-executors, effectively shutting down his mother ...
City of Los Angeles v. Patel, 576 U.S. 409 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Los Angeles law, Municipal Code § 41.49, requiring hotel operators to retain records about guests for a 90-day period, is facially unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it does not allow for pre-compliance review.