When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Endorsement test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endorsement_test

    The proper inquiry under the purpose prong of Lemon, I submit, is whether the government intends to convey a message of endorsement or disapproval of religion. [2] O’Connor’s endorsement test has, on occasion, been subsumed into the Lemon test. In the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals case Doe v.

  3. Lemon v. Kurtzman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemon_v._Kurtzman

    Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971), was a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States. [1] The court ruled in an 8–0 decision that Pennsylvania's Nonpublic Elementary and Secondary Education Act (represented through David Kurtzman) from 1968 was unconstitutional and in an 8–1 decision that Rhode Island's 1969 Salary Supplement Act was unconstitutional, violating the ...

  4. Establishment Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Establishment_Clause

    The excessive entanglement test, together with the secular purpose and primary effect tests thereafter became known as the Lemon test, which judges have often used to test the constitutionality of a statute on establishment clause grounds. The Supreme Court decided Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist and Sloan v. Lemon ...

  5. Corporation of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation_of_Presiding...

    The court then addressed whether the exemption violated the Establishment Clause by using the Lemon test. The court ruled that the exemption permitted by section 702 violated the second prong of the Lemon test (principal effect not advancing or inhibiting religion) because the section "singles out religious entities for a benefit, rather than ...

  6. Mitchell v. Helms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_v._Helms

    The Court used the two relevant criteria of the Lemon test to make a ruling: Does the program have a secular purpose? Does the program have a primary effect of advancing or inhibiting religion? Does the program create an excessive entanglement between government and religion? The third criterion of the Lemon test was held in Agostini v.

  7. Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reckitt_&_Colman_Products...

    Reckitt & Colman Ltd v Borden Inc 1 All ER 873, – also known as the Jif Lemon case – is a leading decision of the House of Lords on the tort of passing off. The Court reaffirmed the three part test (reputation and goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage) in order to establish a claim of passing off. Background per Slade LJ: Reckitt, sold lemon juice under the name "Jif Lemon" which came in ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westside_Community_Board...

    In Part III of Justice O'Connor's opinion, which did not reach a majority of the Court, she applied the Lemon Test to find that the Equal Access Act is constitutional as applied in this case. Justice Kennedy, meanwhile, analyzed the application of the Act under different Court precedents, focusing more upon "coercion".