Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The fighting words doctrine, in United States constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In 1942, the U.S. Supreme Court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in Chaplinsky v.
New Hampshire (1942), the Supreme Court held that speech is unprotected if it constitutes "fighting words". [37] Fighting words, as defined by the Court, is speech that "tend[s] to incite an immediate breach of the peace" by provoking a fight, so long as it is a "personally abusive [word] which, when addressed to the ordinary citizen, is, as a ...
The following pages contain lists of legal terms: List of Latin legal terms; List of legal abbreviations; List of legal abbreviations (canon law) on Wiktionary: Appendix: English legal terms; Appendix: Glossary of legal terms
Chaplinsky admitted that he said the words charged in the complaint, with the exception of "God". For this, he was charged and convicted under a New Hampshire statute forbidding intentionally offensive speech directed at others in a public place. Under New Hampshire's Offensive Conduct law (chap. 378, para. 2 of the NH.
Slip law; Slippery slope; Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List; Spoliation of evidence; Strike for cause; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Substantial disruption; Substantive due process; Substantive law; Sugar bowl (legal maxim) Suppression of evidence; Suspect classification; Symbolic speech
With a law such as the FIGHT Act to protect the public from deadly cross-border crimes, we could finally put an end to the scourge of illegal animal fighting in Texas and across our nation.
Acknowledgment (law) Acting (law) Actual notice; Ad sectam; Adequate remedy; Adjustment (law) Adverse; Adverse inference; Adverse party; Affray; Affreightment; After-acquired property; Age of candidacy; Agreement in principle; Allegation; Allonge; Ambiguity (law) Ampliative; An unjust law is no law at all; Angary; Animus (law) Antecedent (law ...
Consent does not have to be explicit, Tidwell said. All that is needed is “a reasonable belief” that consent was given in words or deed. Here is how the mutual combat statute is written. Sec ...