Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A set of rules can be used to infer any valid conclusion if it is complete, while never inferring an invalid conclusion, if it is sound. A sound and complete set of rules need not include every rule in the following list, as many of the rules are redundant, and can be proven with the other rules.
More formally, proposition B is a corollary of proposition A, if B can be readily deduced from A or is self-evident from its proof. In many cases, a corollary corresponds to a special case of a larger theorem, [4] which makes the theorem easier to use and apply, [5] even though its importance is generally considered to be secondary to that of ...
A porism is a mathematical proposition or corollary. It has been used to refer to a direct consequence of a proof, analogous to how a corollary refers to a direct consequence of a theorem. In modern usage, it is a relationship that holds for an infinite range of values but only if a certain condition is assumed, such as Steiner's porism. [1]
The rules allow the expression of conjunctions and disjunctions purely in terms of each other via negation. The rules can be expressed in English as: not (A or B) = (not A) and (not B) not (A and B) = (not A) or (not B) where "A or B" is an "inclusive or" meaning at least one of A or B rather than an "exclusive or" that means exactly one of A or B.
In mathematical logic, a theory (also called a formal theory) is a set of sentences in a formal language.In most scenarios a deductive system is first understood from context, after which an element of a deductively closed theory is then called a theorem of the theory.
Berger–Kazdan comparison theorem (Riemannian geometry) Bernstein's theorem (approximation theory) Bernstein's theorem (functional analysis) Berry–Esséen theorem (probability theory) Bertini's theorem (algebraic geometry) Bertrand–Diquet–Puiseux theorem (differential geometry) Bertrand's ballot theorem (probability theory, combinatorics)
With the advent of algebraic logic, it became apparent that classical propositional calculus admits other semantics.In Boolean-valued semantics (for classical propositional logic), the truth values are the elements of an arbitrary Boolean algebra; "true" corresponds to the maximal element of the algebra, and "false" corresponds to the minimal element.
Dyckhoff & Negri (2015) list eight consequences of the above theorem that explain its significance (omitting footnotes and most references): [1] In the context of a sequent calculus such as G3c, special coherent implications as axioms can be converted directly to inference rules without affecting the admissibility of the structural rules (Weakening, Contraction and Cut);