Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Cauchy–Schwarz inequality (Modified Schwarz inequality for 2-positive maps [27]) — For a 2-positive map between C*-algebras, for all , in its domain, () ‖ ‖ (), ‖ ‖ ‖ ‖ ‖ ‖. Another generalization is a refinement obtained by interpolating between both sides of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality:
In mathematics, the following inequality is known as Titu's lemma, Bergström's inequality, Engel's form or Sedrakyan's inequality, respectively, referring to the article About the applications of one useful inequality of Nairi Sedrakyan published in 1997, [1] to the book Problem-solving strategies of Arthur Engel published in 1998 and to the book Mathematical Olympiad Treasures of Titu ...
1.4 Fourth proof: Cauchy–Schwarz. 1.5 Fifth proof: AM-GM. ... Titu's lemma, a direct consequence of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, states that for any sequence of ...
There are three inequalities between means to prove. There are various methods to prove the inequalities, including mathematical induction, the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, Lagrange multipliers, and Jensen's inequality. For several proofs that GM ≤ AM, see Inequality of arithmetic and geometric means.
Lagrange's identity for complex numbers has been obtained from a straightforward product identity. A derivation for the reals is obviously even more succinct. Since the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality is a particular case of Lagrange's identity, [4] this proof is yet another way to obtain the CS inequality. Higher order terms in the series produce ...
Schwarz's works include Bestimmung einer speziellen Minimalfläche, which was crowned by the Berlin Academy in 1867 and printed in 1871, and Gesammelte mathematische Abhandlungen (1890). Among other things, Schwarz improved the proof of the Riemann mapping theorem , [ 6 ] developed a special case of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality , and gave a ...
The Paley–Zygmund inequality is sometimes used instead of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and may occasionally give more refined results. Under the (incorrect) assumption that the events v , u in K are always independent, one has Pr ( v , u ∈ K ) = Pr ( v ∈ K ) Pr ( u ∈ K ) {\displaystyle \Pr(v,u\in K)=\Pr(v\in K)\,\Pr(u\in K)} , and ...
2.1 Proof for the general case based on the Chapman–Robbins bound. 2.2 A standalone proof for the general scalar case. ... The Cauchy–Schwarz inequality shows ...