Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
DNS spoofing, also referred to as DNS cache poisoning, is a form of computer security hacking in which corrupt Domain Name System data is introduced into the DNS resolver's cache, causing the name server to return an incorrect result record, e.g. an IP address. This results in traffic being diverted to any computer that the attacker chooses.
DNS hijacking, DNS poisoning, or DNS redirection is the practice of subverting the resolution of Domain Name System (DNS) queries. [1] This can be achieved by malware that overrides a computer's TCP/IP configuration to point at a rogue DNS server under the control of an attacker, or through modifying the behaviour of a trusted DNS server so that it does not comply with internet standards.
Domain Name System (DNS) resolution is the process of translating a human-readable domain name (for example, en.wikipedia.org) into an IP address that computers can use. Every ISP runs a DNS server to allow their customers to translate domain names into IP addresses that computers understand and use.
[citation needed] Pharming can be conducted either by changing the hosts file on a victim's computer or by exploitation of a vulnerability in DNS server software. DNS servers are computers responsible for resolving Internet names into their real IP addresses. Compromised DNS servers are sometimes referred to as "poisoned". Pharming requires ...
ARP Spoofing: Sends fake ARP messages to associate the attacker’s MAC address with a target IP, intercepting local network traffic. DNS Spoofing/Poisoning: Redirects DNS queries to malicious servers, leading victims to fake websites. Session Hijacking: Steals session cookies or tokens to impersonate a legitimate user in an active session.
(Reuters) - Location tracking company Unacast has confirmed to the Norwegian government that it was the victim of a hack, according to a notice published by Norwegian public broadcaster NRK on Friday.
In real-life conditions, this could prove catastrophic." Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
Instead, other implementers assumed that DNS's time to live (TTL) field would limit a guesser to only a few attempts a day. [25] Kaminsky's attack bypassed this TTL defense by targeting "sibling" names like "83.example.com" instead of "www.example.com" directly. Because the name was unique, it had no entry in the cache, and thus no TTL.