When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: kentucky petition for rehearing a lien document free

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Cameron v. EMW Women's Surgical Center, P.S.C. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameron_v._EMW_Women's...

    Attorney General of Kentucky Daniel Cameron sought permission to intervene in defense of the law, but the court of appeals denied the motion and subsequent request to file a petition for rehearing en banc by a 2–1 vote. Judge John K. Bush dissented. [1]

  3. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexmark_International,_Inc...

    Rule 13 of the United States Supreme Court Rules of Procedure requires the losing party in a case before a court of appeals to file a petition for a writ of certiorari within 90 days from the date the court of appeals enters its judgment, or from the date of the denial of a petition for rehearing in the court of appeals. The Sixth Circuit's ...

  4. Rehearing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rehearing

    Rehearing may refer to: In law , a rehearing is a procedure where a tribunal reconsiders a matter after previously conducting a hearing on the same matter Parties generally request rehearings by filing a " petition for rehearing" or a " motion for rehearing"

  5. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewell_Ridge_Coal_Corp._v...

    The employer, Jewell Ridge, sought declaratory judgment against its employee's union to determine whether the time spent traveling underground by the coal miners between the portals of the employer's two bituminous coal mines and the working faces was included in the compensable workweek under § 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 207(a).

  6. McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCreary_County_v...

    McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky, 545 U.S. 844 (2005), was a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on March 2, 2005. [1] At issue was whether the Court should continue to inquire into the purpose behind a religious display and whether evaluation of the government's claim of secular purpose for the religious displays may take evolution into ...

  7. Enjoy lunch breaks? How you could lose rest benefits if KY ...

    www.aol.com/enjoy-lunch-breaks-could-lose...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us