Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In the equation above the conditional probability generalizes the logical statement , i.e. in addition to assigning TRUE or FALSE we can also assign any probability to the statement. The term a ( P ) {\displaystyle a(P)} denotes the base rate (aka. the prior probability ) of P {\displaystyle P} .
In propositional logic, material implication [1] [2] is a valid rule of replacement that allows a conditional statement to be replaced by a disjunction in which the antecedent is negated. The rule states that P implies Q is logically equivalent to not-or and that either form can replace the other in logical proofs.
negation: not propositional logic, Boolean algebra: The statement is true if and only if A is false. A slash placed through another operator is the same as placed in front. The prime symbol is placed after the negated thing, e.g. ′ [2]
The material conditional (also known as material implication) is an operation commonly used in logic.When the conditional symbol is interpreted as material implication, a formula is true unless is true and is false.
Phrased another way, denying the antecedent occurs in the context of an indicative conditional statement and assumes that the negation of the antecedent implies the negation of the consequent. It is a type of mixed hypothetical syllogism that takes on the following form : [ 1 ]
Propositional logic deals with statements, which are defined as declarative sentences having truth value. [29] [1] Examples of statements might include: Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit. London is the capital of England. All Wikipedia editors speak at least three languages.
Any conditional statement consists of at least one sufficient condition and at least one necessary condition. In data analytics , necessity and sufficiency can refer to different causal logics, [ 7 ] where necessary condition analysis and qualitative comparative analysis can be used as analytical techniques for examining necessity and ...
Rules of inference are syntactical transform rules which one can use to infer a conclusion from a premise to create an argument. A set of rules can be used to infer any valid conclusion if it is complete, while never inferring an invalid conclusion, if it is sound.