When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: rule 26 b 1 frcp section 4 of income tax act

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Civil discovery under United States federal law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_discovery_under...

    Section 15 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 provided: [A]ll the said courts of the United States, shall have power in the trial of actions at law, on motion and due notice thereof being given, to require the parties to produce books or writings in their possession or power, which contain evidence pertinent to the issue, in cases and under circumstances where they might be compelled to produce the ...

  3. Zubulake I - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zubulake_I

    U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(b)(1) states that "Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the claim or defense…" creating a wide scope for discovery. [2] Rule 26(b)(2) of the Rules limits the scope of discovery with proportionality considerations.

  4. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Civil...

    2016-2017 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Effective on December 1, 2016) Complete text of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Cornell University Law School) Motions to Dismiss Under FRCP 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1) (Authorized excerpt from "Responses to Complaints" in R. Haig (ed.), Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal ...

  5. Initial conference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_conference

    According to the FRCP, the plaintiff must initiate a conference between the parties to plan for the discovery process after the complaint was served to the defendants. [1] The parties must confer as soon as practicable after the complaint was served to the defendants — and in any event at least 21 days before a scheduling conference is to be held or a scheduling order is due under Rule 16(b).

  6. Hickman v. Taylor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hickman_v._Taylor

    Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947), is a seminal United States Supreme Court case in which the Court recognized the work-product doctrine, which holds that information obtained or produced by or for attorneys in anticipation of litigation may be protected from discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court's decision in the ...

  7. Income tax in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_in_the_United...

    The rate was 2% on income over $4,000, which meant fewer than 10% of households would pay any. ($4,000 was 19.3 times the 1894 nominal GDP per capita of $207.23; the corresponding income in 2021 is $1.3M.) The purpose of the income tax was to make up for revenue that would be lost by tariff reductions. [79]

  8. Tax Anti-Injunction Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Anti-Injunction_Act

    The Tax Anti-Injunction Act, currently codified at 26 U.S.C. § 7421, is a United States federal law originally enacted in 1867. The statute provides that with 14 specified exceptions, "no suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court by any person, whether or not such person is the person against whom such tax was assessed".

  9. Amendments to the Internal Revenue Laws of the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amendments_to_the_Internal...

    P.L. 113-295 Enacted 12/19/14 Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014; Tax Technical Corrections Act of 2014; Stephen Beck, Jr., Achieving a Better Life Experience Act of 2014 P.L. 114-10 Enacted 04/16/15 Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015