When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Carolina_v._Katzenbach

    South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that rejected a challenge from the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach). [1]

  3. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966) The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a valid exercise of Congress's power under Section 2 of the Fifteenth Amendment. Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641 (1966) Congress may enact laws stemming from Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment that increase the rights of citizens beyond what the judiciary ...

  4. Constitution of South Carolina - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_South_Carolina

    The Constitution of the State of South Carolina is the governing document of the U.S. state of South Carolina. It describes the structure and function of the state's government. The current constitution took effect on December 4, 1895. South Carolina has had six other constitutions, which were adopted in 1669, 1776, 1778, 1790, 1865 and 1868. [1]

  5. Early voting is biggest expansion of voting rights in recent ...

    www.aol.com/news/early-voting-biggest-expansion...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifteenth_Amendment_to_the...

    In Guinn v. United States (1915), [55] a unanimous Court struck down an Oklahoma grandfather clause that effectively exempted white voters from a literacy test, finding it to be discriminatory. The Court ruled in the related case Myers v. Anderson (1915), that the officials who enforced such a clause were liable for civil damages. [56] [57]

  7. Kickoff time, how to watch for South Carolina football's non ...

    www.aol.com/kickoff-time-watch-south-carolina...

    COLUMBIA — Kickoff is set for No. 23 South Carolina football's final home game of the season.. The SEC announced Monday that kickoff will be at 4 p.m. ET for the non-conference game between the ...

  8. Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harper_v._Virginia_State...

    Harrison, Governor of Virginia and argued under the name Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections . [ 2 ] In the initial case lawyers for Harper and Butts argued against the constitutionality of the poll tax, but on November 12 the courts dismissed the case, citing 1930s precedents established by the United States Supreme Court .

  9. Thurgood Marshall - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thurgood_Marshall

    [5]: 1502 Marshall helped to try the South Carolina case. [ 5 ] : 1502 He called numerous social scientists and other expert witnesses to testify regarding the harms of segregation; these included the psychology professor Ken Clark , who testified that segregation in schools caused self-hatred among African-American students and inflicted ...