When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Knock-and-announce - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knock-and-announce

    Deputy U.S. Marshals during a knock-and-announce procedure. Knock-and-announce, in United States law criminal procedure, is an ancient common law principle, incorporated into the Fourth Amendment, [1] which requires law enforcement officers to announce their presence and provide residents with an opportunity to open the door prior to a search.

  3. Hudson v. Michigan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_v._Michigan

    Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a violation of the Fourth Amendment requirement that police officers knock, announce their presence, and wait a reasonable amount of time before entering a private residence (the knock-and-announce requirement) does not require suppression of the evidence obtained in the ensuing search.

  4. Richards v. Wisconsin - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richards_v._Wisconsin

    Richards v. Wisconsin, 529 U.S. 385 (1997), was a case before the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not allow a blanket exception to the knock-and-announce rule for investigations of drug-related felonies.

  5. Wilson v. Arkansas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson_v._Arkansas

    Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 (1995), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that the traditional, common-law-derived "knock and announce" rule for executing search warrants must be incorporated into the "reasonableness" analysis of whether the actual execution of the warrant is/was justified under the 4th Amendment.

  6. United States v. Ramirez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Ramirez

    United States v. Ramirez, 523 U.S. 65 (1998), was a case before the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that property damage during a no-knock warrant is irrelevant as long as law enforcement has reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing would be a dangerous move.

  7. Semayne's case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semayne's_case

    Knock-and-announce rule; Castle doctrine Semayne's Case (January 1, 1604) 5 Coke Rep. 91, is an English common law case reported by Sir Edward Coke , who was then the Attorney General of England . In the United States, it is recognized as establishing the " knock-and-announce " rule.

  8. Is Minneapolis' ban on 'no knock' warrants enough to prevent ...

    www.aol.com/news/minneapolis-ban-no-knock...

    A new ban on “no knock” warrants in Minneapolis, enacted in the wake of Amir Locke’s death, is being called one of the strongest of its kind in the nation.

  9. Exigent circumstance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exigent_circumstance

    In criminal procedure law of the United States, an exigent circumstance allows law enforcement (under certain circumstances) to enter a structure without a search warrant, or if they have a "knock and announce" warrant, allows them to enter without knocking and waiting for the owner's permission to enter.