When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Least-upper-bound property - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least-upper-bound_property

    A real number x is the least upper bound (or supremum) for S if x is an upper bound for S and x ≤ y for every upper bound y of S. The least-upper-bound property states that any non-empty set of real numbers that has an upper bound must have a least upper bound in real numbers.

  3. Boolean algebras canonically defined - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_algebras...

    A sup of X is a least upper bound on X, namely an upper bound on X that is less or equal to every upper bound on X. Dually an inf of X is a greatest lower bound on X. The sup of x and y always exists in the underlying poset of a Boolean algebra, being x∨y, and likewise their inf exists, namely x∧y. The empty sup is 0 (the bottom element ...

  4. Complete Boolean algebra - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_Boolean_algebra

    Then given any upper bound X of A 0, A 1, … in P(ω)/Fin, we can find a lesser upper bound, by removing from a representative for X one element of each a n. Therefore the A n have no supremum. Properties of complete Boolean algebras

  5. Lattice (order) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_(order)

    A lattice is an abstract structure studied in the mathematical subdisciplines of order theory and abstract algebra.It consists of a partially ordered set in which every pair of elements has a unique supremum (also called a least upper bound or join) and a unique infimum (also called a greatest lower bound or meet).

  6. Proof complexity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_complexity

    Research in proof complexity is predominantly concerned with proving proof-length lower and upper bounds in various propositional proof systems. For example, among the major challenges of proof complexity is showing that the Frege system, the usual propositional calculus, does not admit polynomial-size proofs of all tautologies. Here the size ...

  7. Dedekind–MacNeille completion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dedekind–MacNeille...

    For each subset A of a partially ordered set S, let A u denote the set of upper bounds of A; that is, an element x of S belongs to A u whenever x is greater than or equal to every element in A. Symmetrically, let A l denote the set of lower bounds of A, the elements that are less than or equal to every element in A.

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Upper and lower bounds - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_and_lower_bounds

    13934 and other numbers x such that x ≥ 13934 would be an upper bound for S. The set S = {42} has 42 as both an upper bound and a lower bound; all other numbers are either an upper bound or a lower bound for that S. Every subset of the natural numbers has a lower bound since the natural numbers have a least element (0 or 1, depending on ...