Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A system of equations whose left-hand sides are linearly independent is always consistent. Putting it another way, according to the Rouché–Capelli theorem, any system of equations (overdetermined or otherwise) is inconsistent if the rank of the augmented matrix is greater than the rank of the coefficient matrix. If, on the other hand, the ...
The value-based argumentation frameworks come from the idea that during an exchange of arguments, some can be stronger than others with respect to a certain value they advance, and so the success of an attack between arguments depends on the difference of these values.
Deterministic system (mathematics) Linear system; Partial differential equation; Dynamical systems and chaos theory; Chaos theory. Chaos argument; Butterfly effect; 0-1 test for chaos; Bifurcation diagram; Feigenbaum constant; Sharkovskii's theorem; Attractor. Strange nonchaotic attractor; Stability theory. Mechanical equilibrium; Astable ...
The following is an example of an argument within the scope of propositional logic: Premise 1: If it's raining, then it's cloudy. Premise 2: It's raining. Conclusion: It's cloudy. The logical form of this argument is known as modus ponens, [39] which is a classically valid form. [40]
In mathematical logic, algebraic logic is the reasoning obtained by manipulating equations with free variables.. What is now usually called classical algebraic logic focuses on the identification and algebraic description of models appropriate for the study of various logics (in the form of classes of algebras that constitute the algebraic semantics for these deductive systems) and connected ...
Substitution into the original equation yields 2b 2 = (2c) 2 = 4c 2. Dividing both sides by 2 yields b 2 = 2c 2. But then, by the same argument as before, 2 divides b 2, so b must be even. However, if a and b are both even, they have 2 as a common factor.
Get answers to your AOL Mail, login, Desktop Gold, AOL app, password and subscription questions. Find the support options to contact customer care by email, chat, or phone number.
Each one has a name (for example, argument from effect to cause) and presents a type of connection between premises and a conclusion in an argument, and this connection is expressed as a rule of inference. Argumentation schemes can include inferences based on different types of reasoning—deductive, inductive, abductive, probabilistic, etc.