When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: pioneer assurance co ltd 1925 ac 619 c for sale craigslist los angeles free stuff

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macaura_v_Northern...

    Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd [1925] AC 619 appeared before the House of Lords concerning the principle of lifting the corporate veil. Unusually, the request to do so was in this case made by the corporation's owner.

  3. Wallersteiner v Moir - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallersteiner_v_Moir

    Wallersteiner v Moir [1974] 1 WLR 991 is a UK company law case concerning piercing the corporate veil. This case was followed by a connected decision, Wallersteiner v Moir (No 2), [1] that concerned the principles behind a derivative claim.

  4. Trustor AB v Smallbone (No 2) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trustor_AB_v_Smallbone_(No_2)

    Sir Andrew Morritt VC held that there was enough evidence to lift the veil on the basis that it was a "mere facade". He noted the tension between Adams v Cape Industries plc and later cases and stated that impropriety is not enough to pierce the veil, but the court is entitled to do so where a company is used ‘as a device or façade to conceal the true facts and the liability of the ...

  5. Category:American companies established in 1925 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more

  6. Lee v Lee's Air Farming Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_v_Lee's_Air_Farming_Ltd

    Lee v Lee's Air Farming Ltd [1960] UKPC 33 is a company law case from New Zealand, also important for UK company law and Indian Companies Act 2013, concerning the corporate veil and separate legal personality.

  7. Jones v Lipman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jones_v_Lipman

    Jones v Lipman [1962] 1 WLR 832 is a UK company law case concerning piercing the corporate veil.It exemplifies the principal case in which the veil will be lifted, that is, when a company is used as a "mere facade" concealing the "true facts", which essentially means it is formed to avoid a pre-existing obligation.

  8. Charles A. Canfield - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_A._Canfield

    In 1887, he moved to Los Angeles, California and founded the Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co. [1] In 1892, he partnered with Edward L. Doheny to develop the first gusher in Los Angeles at the intersection of Patton and Colton streets on Crown Hill, just northwest of today's Downtown Los Angeles.

  9. Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Exchange_Assurance...

    The company received its royal charter under the Royal Exchange and London Assurance Corporation Act 1719 (6 Geo. 1.c. 18), popularly known as the Bubble Act. [3] Under the terms of this legislation, the Royal Exchange and the London Assurance Company were the only incorporated bodies chartered to write marine insurance.